Why media companies insist they are not media companies, why they are wrong, and why it matters

Authors

  • Philip Napoli Duke University, DeWitt-Wallace Center Durham, NC, Estados Unidos da América
  • Robyn Caplan Rutgers University, Data & Society Newark, NJ, Estados Unidos da América

Keywords:

Algorithms, Social media, Media policy, Journalism.

Abstract

A common position amongst social media platforms and online content aggregators is their resistance to being characterized as media companies. Rather, companies such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter have regularly insisted that they should be thought of purely as technology companies. This paper critiques the position that these platforms are technology companies rather than media companies, explores the underlying rationales, and considers the political, legal, and policy implications associated with accepting or rejecting this position. As this paper illustrates, this is no mere semantic distinction, given the history of the precise classification of communications technologies and services having profound ramifications for how these technologies and services are considered by policy-makers and the courts.

Author Biographies

Philip Napoli, Duke University, DeWitt-Wallace Center Durham, NC, Estados Unidos da América

Professor de políticas públicas na Duke University e membro do DeWitt-Wallace Center para mídia e democracia.

Robyn Caplan, Rutgers University, Data & Society Newark, NJ, Estados Unidos da América

Pesquisadora no instituto de pesquisa Data & Society e doutoranda em comunicação e informação na Rutgers University.

Published

2018-06-29

Issue

Section

Dossiê Mediações Algorí­tmicas: olhares das pesquisas em comunicação e mí­dia